We are often asked how well Rubbersidewalks perform
in cold climates. We wondered the same thing ourselves
back in 2003, when all of our installations were on the
temperate West coast. To find out, we sent Rubbersidewalks’
pavers to a nationally accredited lab, asked them to
freeze the parts to 0 degrees Fahrenheit for four days,
then take a sledge hammer to them. The lab had never
had such a request. This wasn’t exactly a standard test.
We wanted someone to try to destroy our product while
it was frozen solid. The lab agreed to do it.
Some time later the test results came in. Despite their
best efforts, the lab technicians had been unable to
crack, break, indent, or even chip the frozen parts.
They had repeated the experiment a number of times. They
also dunked the frozen parts into hot water, for ten
cycles. Again, no damage, or change in measurement.
Buoyed by our discovery, we installed Rubbersidewalks
in New Rochelle, NY, where the winters are both harsh
and cyclic. This was a perfect choice to examine Rubbersidewalks’
performance in freeze-thaw conditions.
Freeze Thaw Action
Called
freeze-thaw or frost-heaves, it’s a result of the ground
expanding when frozen. Actually, it’s the water in
the earth that expands as it turns into ice crystals.
A volume of water expands by 10% when frozen. Freeze-thaw
action occurs mainly in environments where there is
a lot of moisture, and temperatures fluctuate above
and below freezing point. (Expanding ice crystals can
exert pressures up to 21 megapascals (MPa) (2100 kgf/cm²)
(3,046 psi) at -5 °F.
This pressure is higher than the resistance of adjacent
hardscape, such as concrete, and causes it to starting
breaking.
Making
matters worse, when the ice thaws, water flows further
into the fractures. When the temperature drops below
freezing and the water freezes again, the ice enlarges
the cracks even further. Ultimately, the concrete can
shatter.
Throughout
cold climates, spring brings budding leaves, chirping
birds, and miles of broken concrete.
Concrete is likely to break; Rubbersidewalks is guaranteed
not to break.
Elongation
Elongation
is a term that describes a material’s ability to expand
and contract. Concrete has zero elongation. Another
common term is resilience, meaning ’give’. Concrete
is 100% brittle with zero ‘give’. What makes it such
an effective and durable building material makes it
a fragile material as a cold climate sidewalk.
Rubbersidewalks has significant elongation and resilience.
Both the tire rubber and the polyurethane resin which
binds the rubber particles together expand and contract
without any damage to the material itself. Also, Rubbersidewalks
is densely compressed and contains no air or water. As
a result, there are no water molecules within the material
to crystallize.
Lab Reports
- Freeze-Thaw
ASTM
C
1026: Product exposed to 15 cycles of freeze-thaw
at
0
Degrees for 90 days. No change. No facial defects.
No
signs
of crazing, chipping, spailing, or cracking.
- Freezing
Impact
Test:
Rubbersidewalks, at
0
degrees
F for 48 hours, was subjected to measurement tests.
Change
in
measurement was
negligible.
- Rubbersidewalks
at 0
degrees
F for 48 hours were subjected to repeated impact
testing.
Samples
exhibited no signs of crazing, chipping,
spailing,
or
cracks by inspection.
Modularity
Concrete
is monolithic. Even with joint seams, concrete cannot
sustain the 5 -10% sub-base expansion without cracking
or buckling. Rubbersidewalks is modular, with interlocked
1/8” seams. Rubbersidewalks ‘floats’ on top of the
sub-base and can rise and fall with the atmospheric
changes. If a paver remains upraised after the ‘freeze-thaw
season’, it can usually be tamped back down. Occasionally,
some sub base regrading is needed.
Other Winter Considerations
We are
often
asked about how Rubbersidewalks stand up to shoveling
and
snow plowing. New Rochelle was a great real-life test
to answer this question.
Sutton Manor is a street lined with beautiful Linden
trees, trees that had broken the sidewalk. People no
longer walked on the sidewalks, but in the street. Complaints
abounded but no one was willing to risk the welfare of
their Lindens. Jim Maxwell, then Public Works Commissioner
of New Rochelle, NY, sought out Rubbersidewalks as a
solution.
When Rubbersidewalks were installed in September 2004,
not one tree root was cut, trimmed or disturbed. In some
areas we elevated the sub-base to ‘ramp over’ the roots
and in one place we notched the bottom of the pavers
to fit over roots that rose above grade.
The sidewalks were installed in front of two homes.
One belonged to the revered actress Frances Sternhagen;
the other to a retired attorney who made it his mission
to put Rubbersidewalks ‘to the test’. Throughout the
first two winters he shoveled, doused the site with salt
and magnesium chloride, and treated the sidewalks ‘just
like concrete.’
At the end of each season, their existing concrete sidewalks
were in even worse shape than before. Rubbersidewalks
were undamaged and unchanged. Rubbersidewalks had passed
the test.
Product Information
- Salt/Chloride
ASTM
B117:
Product
exposed
for 24 hours. No change in surface; no stain or residue
- Magnesium
Chloride:
Product
soaked
in
saturated solution, removed and allowed to dry.
No
change in surface; no stain or residue
Installation in New Rochelle, NY One year
after
installation,
James
Maxwell
sent us a letter:
“Our
Rubbersidewalks installation, completed last summer,
came through with flying colors. None of the sections
heaved or were damaged or discolored by the action of
snow and ice control materials, or the action of snow
blowers or snow shovels. The contractor performing the
work used two or three bases types of materials (including
stone dust) on which to set the blocks. Having gone through
a winter, one base appears to have worked as well as
the others.
The neighborhood in which the pilot project was done
has a long history of sidewalk vs. tree issues. The two
homeowners who front on the installation were extremely
receptive to our efforts to find a solution to the tree/concrete
conflict. We realize that a single year is not conclusive
as to the longevity or durability of the product, but
the potential is certainly there.
The
cost
for
the
pilot
project
was
$8,400
for
125
l.f.
of
walk,
4 feet
wide
or
about
$16.80
per
square
foot.
Our
bid
price
for
concrete
sidewalk
in
2005
is
about
$8.00
per
square
foot.
A significant
contributor
to
the
cost
was
shipping
this
small
amount
of
material
from
southern
California.
That
coupled
with
this
being
a first
for
the
contractor,
and
the
extra
effort
associated
with
a "pilot
project" added
to
the
cost.”
Two years later, we received an email from James Maxwell,
Former Commissioner, on March 15, 2006 regarding the
project completed in New Rochelle, NY on September 15,
2004:
“The
Rubbersidewalks
have stood up well to the second winter with no discoloration
from deicers or gouging from shovels,
equipment.
I noted some minor movement in a few individual pieces
which may be due to frost still being in the ground.
All in
all, the product looks good.”
Another
email
from
James
Maxwell
on August
22, 2006:
“The
experience
through
the first
winter
here
was that
the product
was no
more
slippery
than
concrete.
Residents
stated
that
the product
was "easier
on the
feet".
The installation
here
was in
a residential
area. ”
Sub-Zero
Recently
we have
been
contacted
about
the performance
of Rubbersidewalks
in sub-zero
temperatures.
We went
back
to our
sledge
hammering
lab and
asked
them
to perform
the same
tests
at 35
degrees
below
zero.
Once
again,
the tests
were
conclusive:
no damage,
no indentation,
no cracking
and no
chipping. Rubbersidewalks was developed to be installed near trees
and to allow the maintenance and preservation of the
urban forest. It could just as well have been created
to eliminate the problem of broken sidewalks in cold
climates. We now have several successful installations
in cold climates, including Garden City, Idaho; Hoboken,
NJ; and Kelowna, British Columbia.
|